Governance in the Anthropocene: The Role of the Arts

We welcome to the blog Marit Hammond, of Keele University, for the next in our series on Environmental Political Theory.


The sea around the Brindisi industrial zone is contaminated with toxins and carcinogens, threatening the sea urchin and mussel populations that are farmed in this area. © Environmental Resistance, http://environmentalresistance.org/art/no-al-carbone/no-al-carbone-view-project/

The sea around the Brindisi industrial zone is contaminated with toxins and carcinogens, threatening the sea urchin and mussel populations that are farmed in this area. © Cerano Power station outflow, from the No Al Carbone series, Environmental Resistance, 2015.

In considering how we can govern ourselves in the Anthropocene era, we cannot avoid the fact that our dominant lifestyles impact the very parameters of all life on the planet as a whole. Political theorists have already stressed the need to reconsider our approaches to sustainability governance in light of this new reality: Sustainability in the Anthropocene is a more complex project than the previous mantra of just having to stay within ecological ‘limits’.[1] Rather than seeing sustainability governance as a management project, looking for technical ‘solutions’ for clearly defined environmental ‘problems’, the Anthropocene demands a political context in which societies assess, reflect on, and respond to dynamic, even unpredictable socio-ecological changes on an ongoing basis. These changes are now innate to the very nature of modern civilisation, not external abnormalities; they inescapably and inexorably occur as a result of everyone’s normal day-to-day lives. Negotiating sustainability within this context is thus fundamentally a matter of value judgement as opposed to scientific-technical neutrality; and it therefore concerns, and must involve, the society at large as opposed to ‘expert’ committees only. The huge scale, global impact, and fundamental open-endedness of changes associated with the Anthropocene thus require societies to be correspondingly reflective in their decision-making, inclusive in their politics, and open and imaginative in developing new visions for the future.

The role of art in Anthropocene governance

From this perspective, the recognition of the Anthropocene as a new era calls for politics to be done differently from before—to be thought of in a much broader, more open and more inclusive way than the ‘traditional’ politics that takes place in parliaments, cabinets and courts. One area that then suddenly plays a vital and very political role, I want to argue, is the realm of the arts. As the public realm par excellence that pushes against boundaries of our thinking as well as being creatively forward-looking, art could play a key role in the socio-political governance of the Anthropocene. The arts are a ‘reservoir for human freedom’[2], resisting hegemonic threats to critical reflectiveness. They constitute the sphere in society that has the potential, and typically the self-understanding, to play the role of an avant-garde—in the words of Lea Ypi, ‘transforming existing cultural and political practices in light of new projects for the emancipation of society.’[3]

In the following, I want to highlight three different ways in which artists—and policy-makers’, civil society actors’, and citizens’ engagement with art—can contribute to this kind of societal ‘learning process,’ which I believe societies need to embark on in the Anthropocene.

Providing resources and knowledge

In its creative function, art can contribute ideas, visions and solutions to projects aiming to build up knowledge and resources needed to meet the challenges of the Anthropocene. An example of work that educates in this way is American artist Ellie Irons’ project ‘The Aesthetics of Urban Soil’. This project involved a workshop that used soil as both an ‘artistic medium’ and a ‘medium for learning:’ Soil samples were collected from environments across New York City, mapped, and then analysed so as to learn about the different types and components of urban soil. The samples were then used to create rubbings and drawings—thus deliberately marrying artistic expression and learning. It is through the creation of an artistic space that a new mode of learning was facilitated. That mode engages with the very core of a new understanding of nature in the Anthropocene: finding, indeed reclaiming nature within human environments, thereby reflecting on human impacts on nature.

Expressing critique/embodying activism

This educative function underlies art’s further role in fostering a general reflectiveness and openness that questions current norms and assumptions more deeply and thus allows radically new visions. For this, art must be critical—something possible because, more piercingly than other modes, artistic expression can draw attention to problematic issues, and question illegitimate realities. Indeed, art can then be a form of activism.

For example, the artist-led collective Environmental Resistance (www.environmentalresistance.org) uses artwork to support protests against industrial pollution. In the project “No Al Carbone” (“No to coal”), artists and scientists collaborated with environmental activists from Brindisi, Italy, to campaign against the unchecked industrial development in the Brindisi Industrial Zone that has produced an ‘incredible quantity’ of ‘particularly toxic’ pollutants in the area, with ‘a devastating impact on the health of the local population and ecosystems alike’.[4] Photography is put together with textual elements as well as scientific data to create a toolkit for activists, whilst at the same time drawing in the wider public with interactive elements such as the QR code at the bottom through which the audience can access pertinent scientific publications, or the use of the photobook as a starting point for discussion at public stalls and on tours through the affected areas.

An area between the petrochemical site and a protected salt marsh covered in contaminated fly-ash wastes

An area between the petrochemical site and a protected salt marsh covered in contaminated fly-ash wastes © Mico Rosa Fly-ash pond, from the No Al Carbone series, Environmental Resitance, 2015.

Similarly, in the “Almásfüzitő: An Index” project, a collaboration with Greenpeace Hungary, their artwork was used in a protest against a Hungarian government license allowing toxic industrial waste to be released into already toxic red mud ponds of the Almásfüzitő Aluminium Factory on the banks of the Danube river.

almas2

A satellite photograph showing the toxic red mud at the Almásfüzitő Aluminium Factory, by the Danube river. © Almasfuzito: An Index, Environmental Resistance, 2012

The aesthetic quality of the artworks—the surreal beauty of the photographs next to the sharp textual components—is precisely what brings home the severity of the pollution in a way that a mere description or more conventional photograph would not: The stark contrast between the beauty of the artwork and the ugliness of the situation that is being protested highlights the issue at hand in a particularly dramatic way. Thus, these art projects also represent a particularly deep and impactful way of engaging with the socio-ecological issues raised by the Anthropocene; but one of a distinctly critical kind.

Pushing the boundaries of the imagination

Finally, art can help promote a general reflexivity by pushing the boundaries of our thinking in imaginative ways. This also contributes to art’s critical function—and is a key foundation for Anthropocene governance by helping social deliberation be more critically reflective and imaginatively open-minded. For where there is particularly narrow-minded thinking in a society, it is often as a result of hegemonic belief systems’ cementing their (often illegitimate) power over society by influencing an intangible ‘grammar’ of the politically thinkable and sayable. Against this, by ‘exploring, shaping, testing and challenging reality and images, thoughts and definitions of reality’, art can play a key role in in ‘unlocking’ and thus enabling the imagination of new, previous unthinkable societal futures.[5] Such ‘defamiliarisation’ of existing reality is the necessary first step towards a deeper questioning and envisioning of more radical alternatives. Thus, because of their imaginative character, the arts have the potential to provide the critical dislocations that enable people to see the given reality in a different light, extending the very boundaries of the thinkable and sayable.

This might be achieved through stories on specific environmental issues, using artistic expression as a way to touch people, engaging them emotionally and thus more deeply than general news stories could—as with the “Green Project” by the Springs Dance Company in partnership with Tearfund, where dance is used as a medium to tell a story about resource use and (in)equality as key issues in sustainability.

© Springs Dance Company/Tearfund 2016. https://springsdancecompany.org.uk/churches/performances/the-green-project/
© Springs Dance Company/Tearfund 2016. https://springsdancecompany.org.uk/churches/performances/the-green-project/

But narrative is not required for art to inspire a general exploring, questioning, and imagining of present and future realities. For instance, projects like Ellie Irons’ ‘Flight Lines,’ created through video recordings of the flight paths of everything crossing a certain patch of sky or landscape, seeks to ‘document the skies’ as a ‘shifting landscape.’ The beauty of these images prompts viewers to reflect in new ways on their natural surroundings, or to notice the mix of animals and human technology in the air around them in ways they haven’t before.

© Ellie Irons and Dan Phiffer 2016, supported by Turbulence.org / http://ellieirons.com/projects/flight-lines/

© Ellie Irons and Dan Phiffer 2016, supported by Turbulence.org. http://ellieirons.com/projects/flight-lines/

All sorts of resources can support our engagement with the Anthropocene. But the aesthetic effect that is unique to art has the power to remove us, even if just for a moment,  from our normal mindsets and perspectives, and thus to  make us view reality from a more deeply invested and more reflective angle. Living as we do in a reality in which incremental policy-making of the conventional sort might simply not suffice—whose enormous scales demand of us both to be prepared for more dramatic, sudden changes and to re-think our possible futures more fundamentally—the ‘dislocations’ art provides might be the very key to being able to engage in politics in a way that matches the challenge of the Anthropocene.

REFERENCES

[1] Dryzek, John S. (2016), ‘Institutions for the Anthropocene: Governance in a Changing Earth System’. Online First View, British Journal of Political Science, pp. 1-20.

[2] Skees, Murray W. (2011), ‘Kant, Adorno and the work of art’. Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (8): 915-933, p. 916.

[3] Ypi, Lea (2012), Global Justice and Avant-Garde Political Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 156.

[4] http://environmentalresistance.org/art/no-al-carbone/no-al-carbone-view-project/

[5] Dieleman, Hans (2008), ‘Sustainability, Art and Reflexivity: why artists and designers may be-come key change agents in sustainability’. In Sacha Kagan and Volker Kirchberg (eds.), Sustainability: A New Frontier for the Arts and Cultures. Frankfurt a. M.: VAS – Verlag für Akademische Schriften, pp. 1-26.

The Anthropocene Idea: Janus-Faced and Interdisciplinary

We welcome to the blog John Meyer, of Humboldt State University, for the next in our series on Environmental Political Theory.


I’m very pleased to contribute to this collection of posts about the challenge of the Anthropocene for environmental political theory (and vice versa). I want to reflect upon two widely espoused Continue reading

Historicizing the Anthropocene: A Peek at Paris

Historians love questions of dating and chronology, and there are two questions about dating the Anthropocene. First, stratigraphy and other sciences have been searching for physical evidence for when Continue reading

Decolonialism and democracy: on the most painful challenges to anthroponomy

In my last post I argued that anthroponomy should be our regulative ideal in our collective responsibility as humankind for our planetary environment.[1] Now I want to ask what major obstacles stand in its way. The ones that are most familiar in environmental political theory are, Continue reading

“Advances in restoration ecology: rising to the challenges of the coming decades”

CITATION:
Perring, M.P. et al. 2015. Ecosphere, 6(8): art. 131.
ON-LINE AVAILABILITY:
ABSTRACT:
Simultaneous environmental changes challenge biodiversity persistence and human wellbeing. The science and practice of restoration ecology, in collaboration with other disciplines, can Continue reading

A moral cartography for the Anthropocene

We welcome Manuel Arias Maldonado, of the University of Malága, as a guest on the blog . . . click for his bio, or go to the “Who we are” tab. This post summarizes an argument in his recent book Environment & Society: Socionatural Relations in the Anthropocene (Springer, 2015).


If the Anthropocene were just a scientific category dealing with natural phenomena, we would not feel so concerned about it. But, as Mike Ellis and Zev Trachtenberg have rightly argued, the Anthropocene is not Continue reading

Surviving the Anthropocene Part 2: Of Omega Points and Oil

My previous post lamented the flawed presentation of climate change at the David Koch-funded Hall of Human Origins and suggested that a spiritual-scientific ideology, traceable in part to Teilhard de Chardin, infuses the Smithsonian’s Human Origins initiative and related events. In this follow-up, I take a closer look at this ideology and its connection to broader currents in contemporary evolutionary thought and the Anthropocene. Continue reading

Surviving the Anthropocene: Big Brains and Big Money at the Smithsonian

We welcome Lisa Sideris, of Indiana University, as a guest on the blog . . . click for her bio, or go to the “Who we are” tab. This is the first installment of a two-part post; please come back again Friday for the conclusion.


In late May this year, two related attractions drew me to the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History in D.C.  One was an ambitious-sounding Continue reading

“The Big Ratchet: How Humanity Thrives in the Face of Natural Crisis: A Biography of an Ingenious Species”

CITATION:
R. DeFries. 2014. New York: Basic Books.
BOOK WEBSITE:
ABSTRACT:

The human species has long lived on the edge of starvation. Now we produce enough food so that all 7 billion of us could eat nearly 3,000 calories every day. This is such an astonishing transformation as to Continue reading

The real inconvenient truth?

This will not be a very scientific post, but it is also not a rant. I am trying to understand something: why is there so little large scale planning and discussion about the inevitable and grave consequences of climate change?

There is a surprising amount of Continue reading

The fundamental ethical adaptation: anthroponomy

We welcome to the blog Jeremy Bendik-Keymer, of Case Western Reserve University, for the next in our series on Environmental Political Theory.


I’m one of those people who doesn’t like the term “environmentalism.” I think every human should take care of her home, want to be mindful of other forms of life on Earth, and should Continue reading

Seeing the Anthropocene in something good

Lake Whitney Water Purification Facility, Hamden, CT. Google Earth. Imagery date 9/19/2013. URL: http://goo.gl/maps/ZfQWL

Lake Whitney Water Purification Facility, Hamden, CT. Google Earth. Imagery date 9/19/2013. URL: http://goo.gl/maps/ZfQWL

Recently someone asked me to point to something good in the Anthropocene. That can be a hard one. The Anthropocene narrative, to the extent that there is a single story there, is typically Continue reading

The Ecological Circumstances of the Circumstances of Politics

This is the first in a series of posts on Environmental Political Theory.


With his famous phrase “the circumstances of politics” the philosopher Jeremy Waldron offers an abstract characterization of what politics are at the most basic level. Waldron holds that Continue reading

Mourning the Dodo: On Significant Otherness in the Anthropocene — Part 2

Polarbrown-2

Pictured here is a “grolar,” one of the many arctic hybrids that are part of the “sexual revolution” going on in the Arctic due to climate change.

In my post last week I wrote about the Mass Extinction Monitoring Observatory (MEMO) currently under construction on the Isle of Portland off the southern coast of England.  This conceptually sophisticated project, led by the architectural firm of David Adjaye, offers a thoughtful means of linking local, global, and planetary histories of the extinction crisis while drawing attention to the fight to preserve the earth’s biodiversity.  As I noted last time, I’m deeply sympathetic to the idea of extending private grieving and collective mourning to include non-human earthly companions that have gone extinct or are gravely endangered.  But I’m uneasy about the MEMO project’s aspirations to becoming a world heritage site that rivals St. Paul’s Cathedral and other historical landmarks.  Such a stone monument seems like an odd nineteenth-century relic in a digital, networked world. Continue reading

Mourning the Dodo: On Significant Otherness in the Anthropocene — Part 1

We welcome Tom Lekan, of the University of South Carolina, as a guest on the blog . . . click for his bio, or go to the “Who we are” tab. This is the first installment of a two-part post; please come back again next week for the conclusion. Continue reading