Climate Change in History Dream Course

Winslow Homer Hurricane, Bahamas

detail of Winslow Homer, Hurricane, Bahamas (1898)

This week, Dr. Suzanne Moon and I begin team-teaching “Climate Change in History” (HSCI 3473: History of Ecology and Environmentalism) as a Presidential Dream Course, a program which allows University of Oklahoma faculty to upgrade an existing course into its dream version, with guest lectures open to the public by international leaders in the field, who also make in-person classroom contact with undergraduate students while on campus.

We’re excited to work with students to understand one of the grand challenges of the contemporary moment. Climate change is challenging humans to reevaluate and restructure the social, political, and environmental foundations of our societies. How did scientists and others come to recognize this threat and how can we understand the emergence of global and local efforts to confront climate change? This course explores the history of climate change, from the emergence of climate science to debates about projects meant to mitigate and adapt to it. Throughout, we will evaluate the past to consider our paths forward.

Focusing on the modern period of history in global perspective, our course will argue that ideas of climate and climate change have a history, which can be traced by looking at the emergence of modern climate science and later debates and projects aimed at mitigating or adapting to climate change. We will explore both climate’s influence (often “impact”) on human society and human impact on the climate, through both anthropogenic climate change and successful mitigation strategies. The course is thus structured around parallel stories of environmental change, human environmental knowledge, and human action on environmental issues. Under the broad umbrella of climate change, course topics include agriculture, deforestation, disasters, globalization, land use, population control, and the extraction and management of natural resources.

Guest speakers will highlight the Little Ice Age; problems of scale, risk, and infrastructure in climate research; interactions of climate change and imperialism; indigenous responses to climate change; and imagining low-carbon futures. The course will examine historically both the diagnosis of environmental problems and the design of environmental solutions, to show how past problems and solutions may inform wiser ethical and political choices today about environmental issues, none more urgent than climate change.

As a teacher taking on a hot topic of contemporary action and debate, I aim to create a particular tone in the classroom: urgent, but not alarmist; realistic, but also hopeful. If cooler heads and rhetoric can prevail, a hotter planet won’t kill us.


Winslow Homer’s watercolor Hurricane, Bahamas (1898) is our cover image for the course–for good reason. Held today at the Met in New York, the painting is both dynamic and ominous. The trees, almost main characters, indicate the wind’s force and direction. The wind-blown palms disrupt the drooping silhouette we expect to see in a landscape painting. Homer uses them to indicate a weather shift—a storm approaches. Through this rendering visible of the invisible wind, what impresses me most as a viewer and as a historian is the mood of anticipation and foreboding, the painting’s conveyance of time and motion in the still and two-dimensional medium of watercolor.

Homer’s image feels apt today. Physical storms are being transformed by climate change, becoming bigger, more frequent, more damaging, and less predictable. Rainfall, flooding, and coastal surges are intensifying. Homer’s setting in the Bahamas recalls recent damaging hurricanes nearby: Matthew in Haiti, 2016 and Maria in Puerto Rico, 2017, which had significant social, economic, environmental, health, and safety impacts, comparable to those of American storms Katrina and Sandy. More dangerous storms remind us that we don’t have to wait to see what climate change will bring: climate change is already affecting how we live. As in Homer’s painting, the storm is coming, but it’s also already here.

Homer’s image is also apt as a metaphor: there is a social or human storm brewing: the winds of opinion are shifting heavily in terms of climate change. A storm is brewing in political conflict over climate change, pitting the majority who recognize the reality of climate change and demand action on it, against the powerful minority of elite actors trying to maintain their hold on government regulation and the fossil fuel economy. Sites of important action include: oil pipelines, climate accords, and social movements from divestiture to Extinction Rebellion and the one-woman army Greta Thunberg. As in a hurricane, the direction and force of these currents of opinion are clear. People believe that climate change is real, is threatening, and must be addressed now.

We may use different terms to organize our decision-making—greenhouse effect, global warming, climate change, Anthropocene, or sixth extinction—but what we all share is a sense that land, sea, and sky are changing in ways that put us at risk, as we hope and we work for the resilience to ride out the storm safely.


Oklahoma is an interesting vantage-point for studying climate change in history. Sometimes it seems all Oklahoma environmental news is bad news: pipeline leaks and human-made earthquakes. Our state figures heavily in the annals of climate change denial—and not only James Inhofe’s famed 2015 stunt of bringing a snowball onto the Senate floor to disprove climate change, which now documents for posterity how little he understands climate science. But also in Petrol Pete and other fossil fuel industry attempts to play down what many scientists, scholars, and activists now call a climate “crisis” or “emergency.” All this might suggest we have a snowball’s chance in hell of studying climate change in a forward-looking, rather than backward-looking, way in Oklahoma.

But there is good news from Oklahoma as well. As a hub in the U.S. energy industry, Oklahoma is also seeing significant growth in wind and solar production, which shows our society slowly making the turn away from fossil fuels. The Oklahoma City area, for example, has a surprising number of electric car charging stations. Last year for the first time the amount of energy produced from coal fell below the amount from renewable sources in both the U.S. and the U.K. Coal is dying out; oil and gas more slowly. Oklahoma will feel the direct economic and environmental effects of the energy industry’s transformation: old jobs lost and new ones created, leaving land and water scarred by decades of drilling, as we learn to keep carbon out of the sky.

Oklahoma also takes a leading role in atmospheric science thanks to the National Weather Center here in Norman. Climate scientists today study “feedbacks,” or climate changes that have effects which cause further climate change: for example, when greenhouse-gas-induced warming melts permafrost, which releases methane, which serves to increase warming. Unless we want to see climate change snowball or cascade, recalling other human-made disasters from Frankenstein to Fukushima (but now on a planetary scale, as a possible existential threat to our species), our attempted solutions to climate change need to address what we put into the air, and the technologies from trees to taxes that we use to take or keep carbon out of it. Oklahoma’s prowess in atmospheric science, weather forecasting, and the energy industry make it an important place to think about climate change.


All lectures are free and open to the public. For information or accommodation on the basis of disability, please contact: Peter Soppelsa ( or Suzanne Moon ( Support for this course was provided by the Office of the President of the University of Oklahoma, the Department of the History of Science, The Department of History, The Department of Native American Studies, and the Institute for Risk and Resilience.

January 23, 7:00–8:30 pm
“Decentering Climate History: The Global Little Ice Age, circa 1570 to 1720”
Gregory T. Cushman, Ph.D. (Associate Professor of International Environmental History, University of Kansas)
Oklahoma Memorial Union, Frontier Room (Co-sponsored by the Department of History)

February 21, 3:30–5:00 pm
“Indigenous Cultural Revitalization as a Response to Climate Change”
Kari Norgaard, Ph.D. (Associate Professor of Sociology and Environmental Studies, University of Oregon)
Oklahoma Memorial Union, Frontier Room (Co-sponsored by the Department of Native American Studies)

February 27, 7:00–8:30 pm
“The Floral Archive: Climate Change, History, and the Problem of Scale”
Deborah Coen, Ph.D. (Professor of History, Yale University)
Oklahoma Memorial Union, Frontier Room

March 6, 3:30–5:00 pm
“Time and Risk in Climate Knowledge: An Infrastructure Perspective”
Paul Edwards, Ph.D. (William J. Perry Fellow in International Security and Senior Research Fellow, Stanford University)
Oklahoma Memorial Union, Scholars Room

April 10, 3:30–5:00 pm
“Imagining and Designing Low-Carbon Societies”
Clark Miller, Ph.D. (Professor in the School for the Future of Innovation in Society, Arizona State University)
Oklahoma Memorial Union, Regents Room (Co-sponsored by the Institute for Risk and Resilience)

April 20, 4:30–6:00 pm
“The 12 Year Window: Locating Crisis, Climate Change, and Colonialism”
Candis Callison, Ph.D. (Associate Professor of Journalism, University of British Columbia)
Oklahoma Memorial Union, Frontier Room (Co-sponsored by the Department of Native American Studies)

Earth Plasticity and Plasticity of Perception

One of my earliest memories as a freshman at UCLA took place in the front row of a cavernous, wood-paneled lecture hall equipped with a black-topped resin demonstration table. The class was Introductory Geology, and the professor a bearded, pony-tailed free spirit giddy with the anticipation of Continue reading

Petro Pete, Plastic Mascot for Plausible Denial

Petro Pete's Big Bad Dream

In 2016, the Oklahoma Energy Resources Board (OERB) published the fourth volume of its “Petro Pete” series of illustrated children’s books. To promote Petro Pete’s Big Bad Dream, K-2 classes throughout the state were invited Continue reading

Pondering a diorama to perceive the Anthropocene

“This sprawling epic is as lively as a natural history museum diorama.” (Stephanie Zacharek, review of “10,000 BC”)

Perceiving means to become conscious of, to realize, to understand, to grasp. Natural history museums strive to enable the public to perceive, commonly in re-creations of past worlds. Who hasn’t gazed over a diorama of the Carboniferous Period, for example, Continue reading

Sensing High Water in Venice

Venice High Water

Flood warning siren in Venice (from Sounds Like Noise)

Visiting Venice this summer suggested some intellectual bridges between cities (see our previous series on the Urban Anthropocene), and our new theme (Perceiving the Anthropocene). How do cities help us perceive the Anthropocene— Continue reading

Video of “Cities and Our Future” panel discussion

Earlier this spring, Cindy Simon Rosenthal offered a series of three posts on the topic of “Cities and Our Future: Governance in the Anthropocene.” On March 6, 2018 (rescheduled
Continue reading

Who Will Lead?

This is the first in Dr. Rosenthal’s three-part series on “Cities and Our Future: Governance in the Anthropocene.”

When President Trump proclaimed that the United States would withdraw from the Paris climate accord, he claimed to represent the “citizens of Pittsburgh not Paris.” Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto was quick to respond, tweeting Continue reading

“Moving from ‘matters of fact’ to ‘matters of concern’ in order to grow economic food futures in the Anthropocene”

Hill, A. 2015.  Agriculture and Human Values, vol. 32: pp. 551-563.
Agrifood scholars commonly adopt “a matter of fact way of speaking” to talk about the extent of neoliberal rollout in the food sector and the viability of “alternatives” to capitalist food initiatives. Over the past few decades Continue reading

“Cities in the age of the Anthropocene: Climate change agents and the potential for mitigation”

Pincetl, S. 2017. Anthropocene, Vol. 20, pp. 74-82.
Cities are human creations where many of the emissions causing climate change originate. Every aspect of daily life in cities Continue reading

Prospection and the Anthropocene

I’d like to share two recent items from the news that make a sobering pairing.

The first is an opinion piece in the New York Times by psychologist Martin Seligman and Times science writer John Tierny summarizing a new theory about human beings that emphasizes our orientation toward the future. Continue reading

“Relative impacts of mitigation, temperature, and precipitation on 21st-century megadrought risk in the American Southwest”

Ault, T.R. et al. 2016. Science Advances, vol. 2, e1600873
Megadroughts are comparable in severity to the worst droughts of the 20th century but are of much longer duration. A megadrought in the American Southwest would impose unprecedented stress on Continue reading

The Iconoclastic Anthropocene: On How We Choose to Destroy Art

Ivo Bazzechi Cimabue FloodOn November 4, 1966, the Arno overflowed its banks into the streets of Florence. A number of prominent foreign art historians, including Frederick Hartt and John Shearman, arrived soon thereafter to assist their Italian colleagues, working generally under the oversight of the Uffizi’s conservation director Umberto Baldini, in developing a response to a cultural emergency: the Italian Renaissance was underwater. Their collective expertise facilitated the arduous work of restoring what could be salvaged from the flood, which had Continue reading