“Intersection of Landscape, Anthropocene and Fourth Paradigm”

CITATION:
A.S. Barau and A.N.M. Ludin. 2012. Living Reviews in Landscape Research, Vol. 6, No. 1.
ON-LINE AVAILABILITY:
ABSTRACT:
This review explores landscape science in the proposed age of the Anthropocene and Fourth Paradigm. Both the Anthropocene and the Fourth Paradigm put landscape science to task, due to the severity of landscape challenges. The article aims to link the concepts of the Anthropocene, the Fourth Paradigm and landscape sustainability in the 21st century. Different sources of publications and information were used to analyse, synthesise and explain the state of landscape research. We searched Thomson Reuters Web of Knowledge, Scopus, and Google Scholar for contents on this article’s key themes – globalisation, urbanisation, the Anthropocene and the Fourth Paradigm. We argue that globalisation and urbanisation are the key driving forces behind landscape change. These driving forces represent the scales of human impact on landscapes. Landscape science plays a major role in the age of data revolution and unprecedented landscape change. The review suggests that landscape scientists and landscape societies should chart a new course for landscape research to exploit the benefits of data to advance landscape sustainability.

This article introduced me to a new domain of knowledge with which I was not familiar: landscape science. As its name indicates, this discipline studies changes in the morphology and constituents of landscapes, hence is particularly pertinent to the themes of this blog. Indeed, the article argues, two forces that are preeminent shapers of landscapes, urbanization and globalization (acting together, “glurbalization”), are at the same time primary drivers of the Anthropocene, i.e. are responsible for some of the pervasive and permanent changes in the Earth system the Anthropocene concept is meant to help us understand. And, of course, “glurbalization” can be viewed in terms of the “habitability approach” we are exploring here: cities now constitute the habitat for half of all human beings, whose lives there are increasingly dependent on global trade networks.

Barau and Ludin’s survey of landscape science (the article is a “living review” of the literature, which the authors can update) points to its applicability to the habitability approach. They suggest that since the 1930’s paradigms have emerged in the field that foreground the ways human activities help constitute the landscapes human beings inhabit. The authors cite Naveh and Lieberman’s (1984) “Total Human Ecosystem paradigm“, which Naveh later characterized as a conception of “a social-ecological super system where humans, together with their total environment, form an indivisible and coherent co-evolutionary geo-bio-anthropological entity” (p. 12). This formulation is suggestive of the dialectical understanding of nature I have discussed in earlier posts.

landscapescienceThe complexity of that entity Naveh proposes—which has geological and biological as well as human dimensions—points to another feature of landscape science which aligns it with our interests on this blog: it is an essentially interdisciplinary enterprise. Barau and Ludin provide the adjacent graphic to illustrate the range of disciplines that contribute to landscape science. And in addition to the physical and social science approaches it shows they also mention humanities-based approaches that consider, for example landscape aesthetic, the cultural meaning of landscapes, and normative principles at work in the political processes by which landscapes are managed.

Finally, this article introduced me to the idea of the “Fourth Paradigm.” That term refers to the use of “big data” in scientific enquiry. Barau and Ludin argue that landscape science is a particularly appropriate field for the use of big data, because it offers the opportunity for a wide range of measurements to quantify landscape change. The aspiration of landscape science regarding the Fourth Paradigm is the production of more accurate models of complex landscapes through the integration of capacities for data collection, communication, and analysis.

The authors’ discussion suggests that improved models, along with enhanced monitoring capacity, can contribute to the habitability of landscapes in a very direct ways, for example by facilitating planning for disaster responses. The fungibility (so to speak) of data can also aid in improving resilience globally, by making it easy to provide information to “data deficient areas” (p. 20). (The authors do take note however of problems that can come with the deployment of big data schemes, e.g. cyber-security.) I certainly do not wish to succumb to the kind of technological utopianism that can accompany discussions of information technology. Nonetheless, it is plausible that more accurate modeling could help with environmental governance by predicting whether policies were likely to compromise a landscape’s future habitability. In general, the Fourth Paradigm idea is obviously aligned with the aim of providing information that helps make people more responsive to the impacts of their habitation practices.


FURTHER READING:
Antrop, M. 2000. “Background concepts for integrated landscape analysis.” Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 77(1–2): 17–28. Provides an overview of landscape science as a discipline that integrates physical, biological, and socio-cultural approaches.
Dozier, J. and Gail, W.B. 2009. “The emerging science of environmental applications.” In The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery, ed. T. Hey et al. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Research. This essay describes the use of data-intensive techniques to develop knowledge aimed at practical decision-making in the environmental realm.
Naveh, Z. and Lieberman, A.S. 1984. Landscape Ecology Theory and Application. New York: Springer. This work introduces the Total Human Ecosystem (THE) paradigm.
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s